This media is currently not available.
Predictive factors for early mortality after Endoscopic ultrasound guided Gastroenterostomy
Poster Abstract

Aims

Endoscopic ultrasound–guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is effective for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). Though costlier and invasive, it offers a chance at better quality of life. We aim to define predictors of poor survival following EUS GE. 

Methods

Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GE for mGOO at the National University Health System (Singapore) over two years were analysed. Uni- and multivariate analyses evaluated factors associated with 30-day mortality.

Results

Technical and clinical success was 90.6%. GOO scores improved from 0.25 ± 0.51 to 2.72 ± 0.52, with time to soft diet taking 2.42 ± 1.82 days. BMI < 20 predicted 30-day mortality (p=0.03). ECOG 4 was strongly associated with 30-day mortality (OR 27.0, 95% CI 1.26–578; p=0.035) (Table 1). Multi-visceral metastases, ascites, and pre-procedure drainage were not predictive. Patients with ECOG 3–4 and BMI < 20 showed less improvement in GOO scores at discharge(2.14 vs 2.88; p=0.015), higher 30-day mortality risk (OR 7.0; p=0.038), and shorter median survival (30 ± 6 vs 79 ± 35 days; log rank p=0.033) (Figure 1).

Variables 

Patients, n 

Events, n 

Crude OR (95% CI)  

Adjusted OR (95% CI) 

BMI 

 

 

 

 

BMI > 20 

10

0

NA 

 

BMI < 20 

22

8

 

Technical Success 

 

 

 

 

Success 

29

7

0.636 (0.05 – 8.12)

 

Failure

3

1

1

 

Clinical Success 

 

 

 

 

Success 

29

6

0.130 (0.01 – 1.69)

 

Failure

3

2

1

 

ECOG

 

 

 

 

ECOG 1

16

1

1

1

ECOG 2

4

2

15 (0.89 – 251)

9.0 (0.52 – 155)

ECOG 3

7

2

6.0 (0.44 – 81.2)

9.0 (0.52 – 155)

ECOG 4 

5

3

22.5 (1.51 – 335) 

27 (1.26 – 578)

 

       
       

 

Presence of Ascites 

 

 

 

 

Grade 0 

18

5

1

 

Grade 1 

0

0

0

 

Grade 2 

12

3

0.867 (0.16 – 4.57)

 

Grade 3 

2

0

 

NGT drainage 

 

 

 

 

Yes 

22

1.5 (0.25 – 9.18)

 

No

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

High Risk Subgroup

7

4

7.0 (1.11 – 44.1)

 

Low Risk Subgroup

25

4

1

 

Conclusions

Disease burden does not affect short term survival after EUS-GE. Patients with ECOG 3–4 and BMI < 20 experienced limited symptomatic improvement and high early mortality, suggesting EUS-GE may offer limited benefit in this subgroup.